There's no single hard deadline in dilapidations, but the timing rules that do exist matter more than most people realise.
A landlord can serve an interim schedule of dilapidations at any point during the last few years of the lease term, and a terminal schedule once the lease has ended or the tenant has vacated. There's no single fixed date, but landlords are generally advised to act promptly once the term end is in sight.
Once a landlord has served a quantified demand, being a schedule with costed figures, the Dilapidations Protocol expects the tenant to respond substantively within a reasonable period, commonly treated as around 56 days. This isn't an absolute legal deadline in every case, but ignoring it or responding late weakens your negotiating position and can count against you if the matter reaches court.
Separately from the Protocol timetable, a landlord's ability to bring a formal legal claim for breach of a repairing covenant is subject to the general limitation period for contract claims, six years from the date of breach in most cases. This is a legal backstop, not a target, and most disputes are resolved long before it becomes relevant.
The real risk of delay isn't missing a strict cut-off, it's that positions harden the longer a dispute drags on. Evidence about the condition of the property at various points becomes harder to establish, and what could have been a straightforward negotiated settlement can turn into a formal dispute simply because too much time passed without proper engagement.
Whether you're a tenant who's just received a schedule or a landlord about to serve one, treat the early weeks as the period that matters most. Getting a surveyor involved in that window, rather than after positions have already hardened, is what keeps costs and stress down on both sides.
Whether you're a tenant who's received a claim or a landlord preparing one, the right specialist advice early changes the outcome.
Outline your situation →